Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New bullet to play with.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gohring3006" data-source="post: 1506610" data-attributes="member: 78762"><p>Yea, I was baffled. My question is, if BCs are calculated with the slight stability decrease in mind with a 8 twist, then what are the BCs when running at 1.5sg and above? Or, is the calculator not taking in account the difference in "balance" that a mono would have because the lead core is missing.</p><p>And in fact they are running at 1.5 Sg or above?</p><p>My reasoning is everybody who's run the Warner's in a 8 twist, are saying the BC is true or slightly low.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gohring3006, post: 1506610, member: 78762"] Yea, I was baffled. My question is, if BCs are calculated with the slight stability decrease in mind with a 8 twist, then what are the BCs when running at 1.5sg and above? Or, is the calculator not taking in account the difference in “balance” that a mono would have because the lead core is missing. And in fact they are running at 1.5 Sg or above? My reasoning is everybody who’s run the Warner’s in a 8 twist, are saying the BC is true or slightly low. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New bullet to play with.
Top