Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New Barnes bullet testing.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiftydriver" data-source="post: 476309" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>partisan1911,</p><p> </p><p>I am not ready to say the TTSX is a better bullet then the Accubond. Ballistically, I think it will top the Accubond pretty handily. That said, I have never had a 338 that would not shoot the Accubond extremely well. Just not enough TTSX bullets in the air and into game YET to fully endorse that bullet as my choice yet.</p><p> </p><p>So far however, I am very impressed. Again, more time and testing to be done and then the all important field testing!!!</p><p> </p><p>I have seen the 225 TTSX. In all honesty, I was hoping they would come out with a 250 gr TTSX but it seems they are not ready to do that yet. Personally, I think the 225 is a bit light for my chamberings and I would prefer to have a bit more bullet length and BC then just shear velocity.</p><p> </p><p>I think the 265 gr TTSX should be usible in anything from the 338 Win Mag on up.</p><p> </p><p>For my wildcats, the 338 AX and 338 AM, I just want a bit more bullet weight which seems to improve consistancy with the larger powder charges of slow burning powder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiftydriver, post: 476309, member: 10"] partisan1911, I am not ready to say the TTSX is a better bullet then the Accubond. Ballistically, I think it will top the Accubond pretty handily. That said, I have never had a 338 that would not shoot the Accubond extremely well. Just not enough TTSX bullets in the air and into game YET to fully endorse that bullet as my choice yet. So far however, I am very impressed. Again, more time and testing to be done and then the all important field testing!!! I have seen the 225 TTSX. In all honesty, I was hoping they would come out with a 250 gr TTSX but it seems they are not ready to do that yet. Personally, I think the 225 is a bit light for my chamberings and I would prefer to have a bit more bullet length and BC then just shear velocity. I think the 265 gr TTSX should be usible in anything from the 338 Win Mag on up. For my wildcats, the 338 AX and 338 AM, I just want a bit more bullet weight which seems to improve consistancy with the larger powder charges of slow burning powder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New Barnes bullet testing.....
Top