Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Needed Energy for killing.... is it a myth??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="devildoc" data-source="post: 200954" data-attributes="member: 5615"><p>Now your qouting sales pitches from gun rags? Come on! I'm not going to do your work for you and research Dr. Fackler. But seriously, there are umpteen million "MD's" touting the curing magic of magnetic bracelets on network T.V. too. That does not mean that there is any substance to their claims. I'm sure there is some substance to McPhearsons book, but many of his postulates have been disproved especially relating to ballistic waves and many others. I'm sure he is a bright man, but just cause his book (published 14yrs ago) says something is true doesn't mean it is. There is a big difference between BB's (non deforming, stable projectile) in ballistic gelatin and hunting bullets smacking animals. If you'd care to research beyond McPhearson's book you may find that many of his theories have been disproven. Out</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="devildoc, post: 200954, member: 5615"] Now your qouting sales pitches from gun rags? Come on! I'm not going to do your work for you and research Dr. Fackler. But seriously, there are umpteen million "MD's" touting the curing magic of magnetic bracelets on network T.V. too. That does not mean that there is any substance to their claims. I'm sure there is some substance to McPhearsons book, but many of his postulates have been disproved especially relating to ballistic waves and many others. I'm sure he is a bright man, but just cause his book (published 14yrs ago) says something is true doesn't mean it is. There is a big difference between BB's (non deforming, stable projectile) in ballistic gelatin and hunting bullets smacking animals. If you'd care to research beyond McPhearson's book you may find that many of his theories have been disproven. Out [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Needed Energy for killing.... is it a myth??
Top