Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Need help: .22-250 load development in minimum shots fired
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="benchracer" data-source="post: 1898426" data-attributes="member: 22069"><p>With bullets from 53 to 75 grains, RL17 has far outperformed anything else I have tried in 22-250. W760 is a bit faster burning, but still in a good range for top performance. Book data for 22-250 is badly out of date (along with the SAAMI twist specification). In comparison to modern powders, the traditional 22-250 powders are actually too fast for optimum performance from such an overbore cartridge.</p><p></p><p>The OP's powder choice is not likely to be a problem. Rate of twist is likely to be a bigger concern.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="benchracer, post: 1898426, member: 22069"] With bullets from 53 to 75 grains, RL17 has far outperformed anything else I have tried in 22-250. W760 is a bit faster burning, but still in a good range for top performance. Book data for 22-250 is badly out of date (along with the SAAMI twist specification). In comparison to modern powders, the traditional 22-250 powders are actually too fast for optimum performance from such an overbore cartridge. The OP's powder choice is not likely to be a problem. Rate of twist is likely to be a bigger concern. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Need help: .22-250 load development in minimum shots fired
Top