Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
My thoughts on solid copper bullets and in comparison to other bullet types.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyMtnMT" data-source="post: 2591588" data-attributes="member: 7999"><p>Never met Rathcoombe and have no idea who it is. I can say that we designed our bullet around his physics paper. It was more difficult than we expected to get a bullet to do what is described as optimal in the writings. When we got the performance to match his findings, it changed everything. Hammer Bullets consistently work better than anything else I have ever seen. Same opinion comes from professional hunters all over the world. We did take the Rathcoombe theory a bit farther than just the shed nose, flat frontal, retained shank. We then started paying attention to how the shed petals acted in relation to the retained shank. Radiating outward too much is not good. Having the petals track along with the retained shank greatly increases the permanent wound channel.</p><p></p><p>So regardless of what is thought of who the brain is behind the Shooting Holes in the Wounding Theory study, I can say the theory is correct and works better than everything else. This comes from first hand experience killing animals. No theory.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyMtnMT, post: 2591588, member: 7999"] Never met Rathcoombe and have no idea who it is. I can say that we designed our bullet around his physics paper. It was more difficult than we expected to get a bullet to do what is described as optimal in the writings. When we got the performance to match his findings, it changed everything. Hammer Bullets consistently work better than anything else I have ever seen. Same opinion comes from professional hunters all over the world. We did take the Rathcoombe theory a bit farther than just the shed nose, flat frontal, retained shank. We then started paying attention to how the shed petals acted in relation to the retained shank. Radiating outward too much is not good. Having the petals track along with the retained shank greatly increases the permanent wound channel. So regardless of what is thought of who the brain is behind the Shooting Holes in the Wounding Theory study, I can say the theory is correct and works better than everything else. This comes from first hand experience killing animals. No theory. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
My thoughts on solid copper bullets and in comparison to other bullet types.
Top