Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
My Rifles Need New Optics:
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Comancheria" data-source="post: 1636718" data-attributes="member: 110141"><p>Thanks. Just did a little more homework—(which I should have done before asking the question as to whether the RF components affect the optics), and found that the lazer is not located inside either barrel, it is in the middle on the outside.</p><p></p><p>Conversely, the lazer used by the $4,500.00 Swarovski ds scope—the all-in-one ballistic solution—resides inside the barrel. And most reviewers report a significant drop in light transmission over the non-range-finding Swaro scopes. And this is supported by the factory claim of something around 85 percent—as opposed to 92 or 93.</p><p></p><p>So another reason I think to avoid this scope—in addition to my fears (hopefully unfounded) about the durability of its electronics under heavy recoil.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Comancheria, post: 1636718, member: 110141"] Thanks. Just did a little more homework—(which I should have done before asking the question as to whether the RF components affect the optics), and found that the lazer is not located inside either barrel, it is in the middle on the outside. Conversely, the lazer used by the $4,500.00 Swarovski ds scope—the all-in-one ballistic solution—resides inside the barrel. And most reviewers report a significant drop in light transmission over the non-range-finding Swaro scopes. And this is supported by the factory claim of something around 85 percent—as opposed to 92 or 93. So another reason I think to avoid this scope—in addition to my fears (hopefully unfounded) about the durability of its electronics under heavy recoil. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
My Rifles Need New Optics:
Top