Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
My issues with the Berger method…..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2392194" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>Unpopular opinion time: in factory rifles the new fancy cartridges do, because they're designed around the "long bullet" premise. 6.5 PRC might not be faster than a 264 WM, but with the shorter case you can seat the bullet longer and more correctly (base past the shoulder) and still fit in a normal mag length. Same story with the 6mm Creedmoor vs 243 WIN, 300 PRC vs 300 RUM, the list goes on.</p><p></p><p>Enter all the people skipping over "in factory rifles" arguing about their long throated chambers in special ordered fast twists.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2392194, member: 116181"] Unpopular opinion time: in factory rifles the new fancy cartridges do, because they're designed around the "long bullet" premise. 6.5 PRC might not be faster than a 264 WM, but with the shorter case you can seat the bullet longer and more correctly (base past the shoulder) and still fit in a normal mag length. Same story with the 6mm Creedmoor vs 243 WIN, 300 PRC vs 300 RUM, the list goes on. Enter all the people skipping over "in factory rifles" arguing about their long throated chambers in special ordered fast twists. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
My issues with the Berger method…..
Top