Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Muzzle brakes...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J E Custom" data-source="post: 1968334" data-attributes="member: 2736"><p>Even though the testing equipment Weatherby uses has flaws as far as we were concerned, It is still a decent way to measure actual recoil even if you have to average 5 or more rounds, it is still a way to measure actual recoil instead of just comparing one brake to another that can only tell you that one brake is better than another.</p><p></p><p>There are formulas that can calculate the recoil of your rifle within a few ft/lbs but it cant tell you what impact any small design change will have on the brake, so we felt we had to do measurements that could show changes as little as 1/16 th of a foot pound (Or .1 ounce) or smaller.</p><p></p><p>With out the capital to spend we had to be creative and find a better way to build a more accurate system and think outside of the box. We looked at more than 8 different methods and found many flaws and inaccuracies for repeatable results.</p><p></p><p>Don't be to hard on Weatherby, <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> at least they didn't claim more than the brake could deliver.<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="👍" title="Thumbs up :thumbsup:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f44d.png" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="👍" title="Thumbs up :thumbsup:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f44d.png" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="👍" title="Thumbs up :thumbsup:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f44d.png" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" /></p><p></p><p>J E CUSTOM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J E Custom, post: 1968334, member: 2736"] Even though the testing equipment Weatherby uses has flaws as far as we were concerned, It is still a decent way to measure actual recoil even if you have to average 5 or more rounds, it is still a way to measure actual recoil instead of just comparing one brake to another that can only tell you that one brake is better than another. There are formulas that can calculate the recoil of your rifle within a few ft/lbs but it cant tell you what impact any small design change will have on the brake, so we felt we had to do measurements that could show changes as little as 1/16 th of a foot pound (Or .1 ounce) or smaller. With out the capital to spend we had to be creative and find a better way to build a more accurate system and think outside of the box. We looked at more than 8 different methods and found many flaws and inaccuracies for repeatable results. Don't be to hard on Weatherby, :) at least they didn't claim more than the brake could deliver.👍👍👍 J E CUSTOM [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Muzzle brakes...
Top