Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Muzzle brakes...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FEENIX" data-source="post: 1967879" data-attributes="member: 14204"><p>That is why I clearly noted the cost of the test and highlighted my personal take on the subject matter. My point was to have an "actual" measurement of recoil in FT-LBS. For instance, if you look at rifle recoil table by Chuck Hawks, a 8.5 lbs .300 WM propelling a 180g at 2960 FPS has recoil energy of 25.9 and recoil velocity of 14. I am not sure how he came up with these numbers but let's assume (I know right) they are correct. "IF" the claim is 50% reduction for muzzle brake X, then the recoil energy at 12.95 is pretty darn good in my book. </p><p></p><p>I am not a fan of WBTY cartridges (actually any proprietary) but love their rifles and hope to own one some day. Based on their current MB offering, I do not think they invested any R&D on MB ... just saying. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Regardless of claim, the end-user have the final say on the MB's effectiveness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FEENIX, post: 1967879, member: 14204"] That is why I clearly noted the cost of the test and highlighted my personal take on the subject matter. My point was to have an "actual" measurement of recoil in FT-LBS. For instance, if you look at rifle recoil table by Chuck Hawks, a 8.5 lbs .300 WM propelling a 180g at 2960 FPS has recoil energy of 25.9 and recoil velocity of 14. I am not sure how he came up with these numbers but let's assume (I know right) they are correct. "IF" the claim is 50% reduction for muzzle brake X, then the recoil energy at 12.95 is pretty darn good in my book. I am not a fan of WBTY cartridges (actually any proprietary) but love their rifles and hope to own one some day. Based on their current MB offering, I do not think they invested any R&D on MB ... just saying. :) Regardless of claim, the end-user have the final say on the MB's effectiveness. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Muzzle brakes...
Top