Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
MRAD vs MOA. Which one?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dfanonymous" data-source="post: 1937054" data-attributes="member: 97050"><p>I don't get it. Let's say you have a target at 731 yards away. How does 1 inch at 100 or 3.6 at 100 or 12.9 inches at 700y help you hit that target? Let's say you miss, and you try to guess distance. How do you know what a yard or an inch is at 731y are...accurately? I'm just saying... if you do know what a inch looks like at 731 yards away, then I suppose you can multiply 3.6x(whatever100y's) and magically get legitimate the same corrections or math or whatever the 1.047@100 does for you. </p><p></p><p>But back to how things really work:</p><p>The solutions are in moa, mils or iphy. </p><p>The corrections are in moa, mils or iphy.</p><p></p><p>"The math" is not things people use or seem to know about much on here ie; quick wind and speed drop.</p><p></p><p>The reticle is your measuring tool. If you miss, measure how many mils, and correct. Don't guess, start trying to figure out how many millimeters go into cm to mils based off it "looked like you missed by 4.25 inches" at 1300y. There's nothing to get.</p><p></p><p>Your dope is still your dope.</p><p></p><p>even if you zero, say you look in the reticle and you measure our needing to come up .2 mils and over right 1.2 mils. Umm....just do that. We don't need to start metricing or imperializing angle to get what we need. It's a non linear number in nature.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dfanonymous, post: 1937054, member: 97050"] I don’t get it. Let’s say you have a target at 731 yards away. How does 1 inch at 100 or 3.6 at 100 or 12.9 inches at 700y help you hit that target? Let’s say you miss, and you try to guess distance. How do you know what a yard or an inch is at 731y are...accurately? I’m just saying... if you do know what a inch looks like at 731 yards away, then I suppose you can multiply 3.6x(whatever100y’s) and magically get legitimate the same corrections or math or whatever the 1.047@100 does for you. But back to how things really work: The solutions are in moa, mils or iphy. The corrections are in moa, mils or iphy. “The math” is not things people use or seem to know about much on here ie; quick wind and speed drop. The reticle is your measuring tool. If you miss, measure how many mils, and correct. Don’t guess, start trying to figure out how many millimeters go into cm to mils based off it “looked like you missed by 4.25 inches” at 1300y. There’s nothing to get. Your dope is still your dope. even if you zero, say you look in the reticle and you measure our needing to come up .2 mils and over right 1.2 mils. Umm....just do that. We don’t need to start metricing or imperializing angle to get what we need. It’s a non linear number in nature. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
MRAD vs MOA. Which one?
Top