Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Moving from 6.5 PRC to 300 PRC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IHFarmer07" data-source="post: 2449628" data-attributes="member: 75397"><p>How are you supposed to sight a rifle in if it don't track? One shot hits bullseye and the next shot hits a 1' or so this way or that way…….what's the point of good clear glass because you won't be shooting far.</p><p></p><p>Just how many scopes out there on the market now are so unclear that you can't see through?? Sure your not going to shoot to 1000+ yards with a tasco because of tracking, but I'm sure you can see the target. If you dial for your corrections glass is not going to help you and if your a good hunter/shooter you should know your limitations with the equipment you have.</p><p></p><p>A $50 tasco, simmons, nc star etc can get things done well enough for the casual hunters with brush guns, I know plenty of them.</p><p></p><p>If you had a scope that didn't track and you use it for long range target 500 yards+ and mid range hunting <500 yards but had awesome glass would you use it?</p><p></p><p>What if you had a scope that tracked 98% to accuracy but the glass was mediocre, would you use it and just use it to the best of your abilities and know your limitations because of the glass?</p><p></p><p>What is the most important aspect of a scope review by genuine scope reviewers focus on? Tracking</p><p></p><p>It would be an interesting poll here to see how many would choose glass over tracking.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, back to the topic at hand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IHFarmer07, post: 2449628, member: 75397"] How are you supposed to sight a rifle in if it don’t track? One shot hits bullseye and the next shot hits a 1’ or so this way or that way…….what’s the point of good clear glass because you won’t be shooting far. Just how many scopes out there on the market now are so unclear that you can’t see through?? Sure your not going to shoot to 1000+ yards with a tasco because of tracking, but I’m sure you can see the target. If you dial for your corrections glass is not going to help you and if your a good hunter/shooter you should know your limitations with the equipment you have. A $50 tasco, simmons, nc star etc can get things done well enough for the casual hunters with brush guns, I know plenty of them. If you had a scope that didn’t track and you use it for long range target 500 yards+ and mid range hunting <500 yards but had awesome glass would you use it? What if you had a scope that tracked 98% to accuracy but the glass was mediocre, would you use it and just use it to the best of your abilities and know your limitations because of the glass? What is the most important aspect of a scope review by genuine scope reviewers focus on? Tracking It would be an interesting poll here to see how many would choose glass over tracking. Anyway, back to the topic at hand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Moving from 6.5 PRC to 300 PRC
Top