Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
More News on the 6.5 Creedmoor: U.S. Military and DHS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dfanonymous" data-source="post: 1662874" data-attributes="member: 97050"><p>While i agree with a 155 grain not being equal or better than a heavier grain bullet (308), as I put above, I'm also not defending the creedmoor being "superior."</p><p></p><p>As for the military, ask a 20 to 35 year old SOF dude if they care about recoil. </p><p>The 18 to 21 year old infantry man could also careless. The bigger the boom the bigger the smile. As for the brass and bureaucrats, they seldom care about the comfort of the fighting force.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dfanonymous, post: 1662874, member: 97050"] While i agree with a 155 grain not being equal or better than a heavier grain bullet (308), as I put above, I’m also not defending the creedmoor being “superior.” As for the military, ask a 20 to 35 year old SOF dude if they care about recoil. The 18 to 21 year old infantry man could also careless. The bigger the boom the bigger the smile. As for the brass and bureaucrats, they seldom care about the comfort of the fighting force. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
More News on the 6.5 Creedmoor: U.S. Military and DHS
Top