Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
More News on the 6.5 Creedmoor: U.S. Military and DHS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RoyB" data-source="post: 1633541" data-attributes="member: 1632"><p>I read an article a while ago about the 308 NATO round and why it was adopted. After WWII studies were done on the best caliber for a nato cartridge. The .277 caliber was decided on. USA vetoed the decision....the reason...." we have one billion 30 caliber bullets in inventory...the new NATO cartridge Will Be 308 based...."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RoyB, post: 1633541, member: 1632"] I read an article a while ago about the 308 NATO round and why it was adopted. After WWII studies were done on the best caliber for a nato cartridge. The .277 caliber was decided on. USA vetoed the decision....the reason....” we have one billion 30 caliber bullets in inventory...the new NATO cartridge Will Be 308 based....” [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
More News on the 6.5 Creedmoor: U.S. Military and DHS
Top