Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
More News on the 6.5 Creedmoor: U.S. Military and DHS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="just country" data-source="post: 1633516" data-attributes="member: 82689"><p>morning, Geneva Procotol was considered part of the Hague</p><p>Convention & military ammunition.</p><p>Hague IV, Declaration III Concerning the Prohibition of the use</p><p>of Expanding Bullets, July 29,1899, 26 Martens Nouveau Recueil</p><p>(ser.2) 1002, 187 Consol T.S. 459, entered into force Sept.</p><p>4, 1900.</p><p>The human rights library wishes to express its gratitude to</p><p>institute Henry Dunant for its contribution of this document.</p><p></p><p>It is commonly thought that the requirement for FMJ</p><p>ammunition was instituted by the Geneva conventions,</p><p>likely from confusing the Geneva conventions with</p><p>Geneva protocol (part of the Hague convention).</p><p>while it is technically true that FMJ bullets are not expressly</p><p>required by either the Geneva protocol or the Hogue convention,</p><p>the Geneva protocol is widely considered to a part of the</p><p>hague convention and the hague requires the following.</p><p>for our members to understand these mentioned documents</p><p>b advised this is very good reading.</p><p></p><p>Iraq and afganistan sp r not part of this agreement.</p><p>Firstly, this has NO Relation to the 6.8 verse</p><p>6.5G. or any other cartridge, this purely meant to discuss</p><p>international rules of war as they relate to the development</p><p> and selection of military issued ammunition.</p><p>justme gbot tum</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="just country, post: 1633516, member: 82689"] morning, Geneva Procotol was considered part of the Hague Convention & military ammunition. Hague IV, Declaration III Concerning the Prohibition of the use of Expanding Bullets, July 29,1899, 26 Martens Nouveau Recueil (ser.2) 1002, 187 Consol T.S. 459, entered into force Sept. 4, 1900. The human rights library wishes to express its gratitude to institute Henry Dunant for its contribution of this document. It is commonly thought that the requirement for FMJ ammunition was instituted by the Geneva conventions, likely from confusing the Geneva conventions with Geneva protocol (part of the Hague convention). while it is technically true that FMJ bullets are not expressly required by either the Geneva protocol or the Hogue convention, the Geneva protocol is widely considered to a part of the hague convention and the hague requires the following. for our members to understand these mentioned documents b advised this is very good reading. Iraq and afganistan sp r not part of this agreement. Firstly, this has NO Relation to the 6.8 verse 6.5G. or any other cartridge, this purely meant to discuss international rules of war as they relate to the development and selection of military issued ammunition. justme gbot tum [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
More News on the 6.5 Creedmoor: U.S. Military and DHS
Top