Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
Montana nonresident elk tags
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="calling4life" data-source="post: 2208823" data-attributes="member: 48454"><p>Who's in an uproar? </p><p>Not to mention, sharing/commenting openly would also mean accepting if others dissent/disagree/feel differently. You sound like you want people to give you what you want, say what you want, or otherwise wish them silent, not like you're for "sharing openly." </p><p></p><p>The discussion of this law is relevant because you have power if you get to hunt because of the law, you could call up your outfitter and let them know that because you don't agree with said law, you'll not be going with them.</p><p></p><p>If enough people did this the law may be repealed.</p><p></p><p>If you do agree, well, then this was just a dissenting rambling and I hope you have a good hunt.</p><p></p><p>To be honest it was just musings brought on by a prior post for me, not sure how I feel about this one personally, don't know that it matters. </p><p>The point on just upping the tags seems to have more merit the more I think on it, at least the money would go back to the wildlife, and since they're paying for this with their lives, it seems rather relevant, more so than what seems to be subsidizing a business sector. </p><p></p><p>But outfitters can be good stewards for our sport as well... perhaps a six of one half a dozen of the other situation...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="calling4life, post: 2208823, member: 48454"] Who's in an uproar? Not to mention, sharing/commenting openly would also mean accepting if others dissent/disagree/feel differently. You sound like you want people to give you what you want, say what you want, or otherwise wish them silent, not like you're for "sharing openly." The discussion of this law is relevant because you have power if you get to hunt because of the law, you could call up your outfitter and let them know that because you don't agree with said law, you'll not be going with them. If enough people did this the law may be repealed. If you do agree, well, then this was just a dissenting rambling and I hope you have a good hunt. To be honest it was just musings brought on by a prior post for me, not sure how I feel about this one personally, don't know that it matters. The point on just upping the tags seems to have more merit the more I think on it, at least the money would go back to the wildlife, and since they're paying for this with their lives, it seems rather relevant, more so than what seems to be subsidizing a business sector. But outfitters can be good stewards for our sport as well... perhaps a six of one half a dozen of the other situation... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
Montana nonresident elk tags
Top