Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Montana & Arizona
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hugnot" data-source="post: 1992605" data-attributes="member: 115658"><p>Kathy's last ad includes Kathy with a small group of her lady friends. all attired in hunting garb and holding shotguns, posing by a barbed wire fence next to a big field - apparently they are about to shoot some birds ("been hunting for 20 years"). From this ad I am able to see that Kathy is into "Montana Values" which includes hunting. </p><p></p><p>Would there be an element of hypocrisy should an inspection of their ammo reveal lead shot?</p><p></p><p>Would Kathy's brand of environmentalism ban lead core bullets, reduce access on public by banning motor vehicles, restrict camping on public lands, restrict hunting on large blocks of public lands for abstract reasons, promote a "hands off" forest management policy to enable bigger and more destructive wild fires then blame "climate change caused by CO2", and other "sound good" stuff like return to Paris Climate Accord and reach into the Security & Exchange Commission for investment activities.</p><p></p><p>Would Kathy be a tool of Nancy and Chuck to gradually increase restrictions of our shooting sports and gun rights under the guise of environmentalism?</p><p></p><p>Would Kathy assist in turning Montana into some California type state under Nancy's direction?</p><p></p><p>I will vote for Matt. </p><p></p><p>Possibly, coyotes might have increased rights as per the anthropomorphism stuff that makes the yotes similar to politicians.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hugnot, post: 1992605, member: 115658"] Kathy's last ad includes Kathy with a small group of her lady friends. all attired in hunting garb and holding shotguns, posing by a barbed wire fence next to a big field - apparently they are about to shoot some birds ("been hunting for 20 years"). From this ad I am able to see that Kathy is into "Montana Values" which includes hunting. Would there be an element of hypocrisy should an inspection of their ammo reveal lead shot? Would Kathy's brand of environmentalism ban lead core bullets, reduce access on public by banning motor vehicles, restrict camping on public lands, restrict hunting on large blocks of public lands for abstract reasons, promote a "hands off" forest management policy to enable bigger and more destructive wild fires then blame "climate change caused by CO2", and other "sound good" stuff like return to Paris Climate Accord and reach into the Security & Exchange Commission for investment activities. Would Kathy be a tool of Nancy and Chuck to gradually increase restrictions of our shooting sports and gun rights under the guise of environmentalism? Would Kathy assist in turning Montana into some California type state under Nancy's direction? I will vote for Matt. Possibly, coyotes might have increased rights as per the anthropomorphism stuff that makes the yotes similar to politicians. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Montana & Arizona
Top