Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Mil-dot vs. Duplex
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CS T" data-source="post: 238827" data-attributes="member: 2585"><p>The Leupold's are great scope and will do the job better than the other ones I will talk about but they will do the job. <strong>I'm a big believer in you pay for what you get</strong>. </p><p></p><p>I tested a Bushnell ELITE 3200 5-15x40mm Tactical Mil-Dot on a 223 and it worked well. The turrets have positive clicks but they have play in them, the main tube has a nice feel to it but it is a 1" tube, the obj is well marked but feel a little cheap, and the Mil-Dot reticle is a little on the thick side for me but the Bushnell Mil-Dot will do the job. Over all it was a nice scope for the PRICE. It was not robust enough for me to have it on that 223 for the 223 see some abuse so I put it on one of my 22 rifles.</p><p></p><p>Here it is on my CZ 452</p><p><img src="http://i517.photobucket.com/albums/u340/csgunworks/P1040839-1.jpg?t=1226082923" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>The Leupold MK2 are nice and fill better made. </p><p></p><p><strong>Mil-Dot reticles</strong> are nice to have for holdovers. I use holdover for quick shoots and wind-age. For a lot of people the duplex will work just fine. </p><p></p><p>We have some used Leupold scopes in stock that are in very, very good condition. </p><p><strong>USED</strong> 57180 VX-III 6.5-20x50mm Long Range Target Matte Varmint Hunters (NEW $879.99) Asking $680.00</p><p><strong>USED</strong> 55152 VX-III 6.5-20x40mm EFR Target Matte Fine Duplex (NEW $669.99) Asking $500.00.</p><p></p><p>Here is a link to the used scopes:</p><p><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f40/used-scopes-nightforce-leupold-35331/" target="_blank">http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f40/used-scopes-nightforce-leupold-35331/</a></p><p></p><p>Mike @ CSGW</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CS T, post: 238827, member: 2585"] The Leupold’s are great scope and will do the job better than the other ones I will talk about but they will do the job. [b]I’m a big believer in you pay for what you get[/b]. I tested a Bushnell ELITE 3200 5-15x40mm Tactical Mil-Dot on a 223 and it worked well. The turrets have positive clicks but they have play in them, the main tube has a nice feel to it but it is a 1” tube, the obj is well marked but feel a little cheap, and the Mil-Dot reticle is a little on the thick side for me but the Bushnell Mil-Dot will do the job. Over all it was a nice scope for the PRICE. It was not robust enough for me to have it on that 223 for the 223 see some abuse so I put it on one of my 22 rifles. Here it is on my CZ 452 [img]http://i517.photobucket.com/albums/u340/csgunworks/P1040839-1.jpg?t=1226082923[/img] The Leupold MK2 are nice and fill better made. [b]Mil-Dot reticles[/b] are nice to have for holdovers. I use holdover for quick shoots and wind-age. For a lot of people the duplex will work just fine. We have some used Leupold scopes in stock that are in very, very good condition. [b]USED[/b] 57180 VX-III 6.5-20x50mm Long Range Target Matte Varmint Hunters (NEW $879.99) Asking $680.00 [b]USED[/b] 55152 VX-III 6.5-20x40mm EFR Target Matte Fine Duplex (NEW $669.99) Asking $500.00. Here is a link to the used scopes: [url]http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f40/used-scopes-nightforce-leupold-35331/[/url] Mike @ CSGW [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Mil-dot vs. Duplex
Top