Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mil dot vs. Ballistic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sscoyote" data-source="post: 596944" data-attributes="member: 1133"><p>I'd take a really hard look at Leupold's Varmint Hunter's reticle. Dont worry about the rangefinding applications of any multi-stadia reticle (including BDC)--any of them can be applied for rangefinding once subtension is known, often more accurately than the std. mil-dot.</p><p></p><p>That reticle has good windage reference that's easily broken down, and the 3 1.77 MOA units either side of reticle axis are excellent for that application as well along with a tgt. elevation turret. It's a simple but adequate system, that works great in the field.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sscoyote, post: 596944, member: 1133"] I'd take a really hard look at Leupold's Varmint Hunter's reticle. Dont worry about the rangefinding applications of any multi-stadia reticle (including BDC)--any of them can be applied for rangefinding once subtension is known, often more accurately than the std. mil-dot. That reticle has good windage reference that's easily broken down, and the 3 1.77 MOA units either side of reticle axis are excellent for that application as well along with a tgt. elevation turret. It's a simple but adequate system, that works great in the field. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mil dot vs. Ballistic
Top