Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
maybe this is the year for a suppressor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Irish Neil" data-source="post: 1744404" data-attributes="member: 95048"><p>We have the strictest firearms laws in Europe so it amazes me to see how difficult it is to get a suppressor in the USA. We apply for them when licensing a new rifle and it takes 6 to 12 weeks for it to come through. Getting to the point, suppresses are very common and are usually direct thread. Many of the suppressors we use shroud the barrel so would not allow a muzzle brake to be integral with the suppressor. </p><p>It took me years to accept a suppressor but I find the advantages far outweigh any disadvantages ; more accurate , flatter trajectory , much reduced recoil and most importantly quarry are confused as to where a shot has come from when you are culling.The disadvantages are they extend the length of the gun which can be awkward in heavy brush and leaving the suppressors attached can cause chemical corrosion so I remove it religiously after shooting. So to answer your question , for what my opinion is worth, go for a direct suppressor and you might look at a trigger widener as another essential addition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Irish Neil, post: 1744404, member: 95048"] We have the strictest firearms laws in Europe so it amazes me to see how difficult it is to get a suppressor in the USA. We apply for them when licensing a new rifle and it takes 6 to 12 weeks for it to come through. Getting to the point, suppresses are very common and are usually direct thread. Many of the suppressors we use shroud the barrel so would not allow a muzzle brake to be integral with the suppressor. It took me years to accept a suppressor but I find the advantages far outweigh any disadvantages ; more accurate , flatter trajectory , much reduced recoil and most importantly quarry are confused as to where a shot has come from when you are culling.The disadvantages are they extend the length of the gun which can be awkward in heavy brush and leaving the suppressors attached can cause chemical corrosion so I remove it religiously after shooting. So to answer your question , for what my opinion is worth, go for a direct suppressor and you might look at a trigger widener as another essential addition. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
maybe this is the year for a suppressor
Top