Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Mass Shootings - Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2buffalo" data-source="post: 2538502" data-attributes="member: 122577"><p>Mark,</p><p></p><p>The problem IMO with what you are saying is who is in charge of identifying a "high risk individual"? What is the definition of a "high risk individual"? Who defines "aggressive monitoring"? Seems ripe for abuse if someone doesn't like what someone else has to say and one person's definition can be completely different than another person's definition. Should we aggressively monitor all who were involved in the riots of recent years? I think some would say yes whether it was BLM, ANTIFA, or the January 6th riots and it would all depends on people's political views whether they think so or not. We currently use the IRS and FBI as political bludgeoning tools. Do you think what you are suggesting would be any different? Where would we get all these government employees to "aggressively monitor" all these people that could reach 10's of thousands to hundreds of thousands? Just something to think about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2buffalo, post: 2538502, member: 122577"] Mark, The problem IMO with what you are saying is who is in charge of identifying a "high risk individual"? What is the definition of a "high risk individual"? Who defines "aggressive monitoring"? Seems ripe for abuse if someone doesn't like what someone else has to say and one person's definition can be completely different than another person's definition. Should we aggressively monitor all who were involved in the riots of recent years? I think some would say yes whether it was BLM, ANTIFA, or the January 6th riots and it would all depends on people's political views whether they think so or not. We currently use the IRS and FBI as political bludgeoning tools. Do you think what you are suggesting would be any different? Where would we get all these government employees to "aggressively monitor" all these people that could reach 10's of thousands to hundreds of thousands? Just something to think about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Mass Shootings - Why?
Top