Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mark 4 vs sightron S3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Longshot38" data-source="post: 249671" data-attributes="member: 11627"><p>Mike when I am talking about the "slack" I'm not talking about the mush in the clicks. I find the turrets to have a solid positive feel with audible clicks. I'm talking about the fact that I have to dial past where I need to be and come back down to the correct adjustment in order to reliably move the correct distance.</p><p></p><p>Linksmechanic. While I don't doubt that the Leupold is stronger then Sightron. The both offer perfectly reliable adjustment but I prefer the Sightron due to the reasons mentioned above. As far as using the military as a standard of what optic is best that isn't the best judge by any means. Sure they have used some outstanding stuff and then they have also used some not so good stuff also. You have to remember that when the military bids for a new product they bid it out to the lowest bidder that meets their specs. Lets face it Leupold makes a OK scope. The optics are alright and the total package is good but there is better on the market. </p><p></p><p>As for the glass doing a side by side comparision the glass on my Sightron is MUCH better. I can see an obvious difference in the two and the Sightron is the better of the two. For me I will pick a SIII any day over a Mark 4.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Longshot38, post: 249671, member: 11627"] Mike when I am talking about the "slack" I'm not talking about the mush in the clicks. I find the turrets to have a solid positive feel with audible clicks. I'm talking about the fact that I have to dial past where I need to be and come back down to the correct adjustment in order to reliably move the correct distance. Linksmechanic. While I don't doubt that the Leupold is stronger then Sightron. The both offer perfectly reliable adjustment but I prefer the Sightron due to the reasons mentioned above. As far as using the military as a standard of what optic is best that isn't the best judge by any means. Sure they have used some outstanding stuff and then they have also used some not so good stuff also. You have to remember that when the military bids for a new product they bid it out to the lowest bidder that meets their specs. Lets face it Leupold makes a OK scope. The optics are alright and the total package is good but there is better on the market. As for the glass doing a side by side comparision the glass on my Sightron is MUCH better. I can see an obvious difference in the two and the Sightron is the better of the two. For me I will pick a SIII any day over a Mark 4. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mark 4 vs sightron S3
Top