Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mark 4 vs sightron S3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="linksmechanic" data-source="post: 249566" data-attributes="member: 7317"><p>Longshot: The mark 4's have a dual erector setup that is 100 times stronger than the sightron. It was designed to handle the recoil of the .50 bmg for the military. The mark 4 is a better scope in all ways and sorry but this is not an opinion, it's a fact. You don't see any sightron's on the military's rifles. There a good scope, but there in a different class. I would put them with the millet, high end bushnell and other similar scopes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="linksmechanic, post: 249566, member: 7317"] Longshot: The mark 4's have a dual erector setup that is 100 times stronger than the sightron. It was designed to handle the recoil of the .50 bmg for the military. The mark 4 is a better scope in all ways and sorry but this is not an opinion, it's a fact. You don't see any sightron's on the military's rifles. There a good scope, but there in a different class. I would put them with the millet, high end bushnell and other similar scopes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mark 4 vs sightron S3
Top