Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March FX 4.5-28X52 Review (So Far)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 2678368" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>Very nice review! And some great shots on nice animals! </p><p></p><p>I have a March 2.5x25x52 SFP/MTR-3 that has been hunted heavily, subjected to the elements and bumped around on and ATV for about 5 years. My experiences concerning reliability and performance are quite comparable to yours. I have not experienced ANY issues. IMO, the stand-out feature of my March is its "unique" ability cut through low sun glare/haze, frequently encountered with my first/last light whitetail hunting. I understand that it is a combination of the internal tube coating and lense design.coatings. I recently acquired, and put a season of hunting on a ZCO420, desiring FFP and MIL capability, as well as seeking improved glass (particularly low light clarity/resolution. A bit bulkier due to the 36mm tube, and about a half a pound heavier being the physical differences, IMO, the basic spec difference(s), and the optical quality(superb!), for my requirements did square the cost between the ZCO and the March. I would add that I have rarely, if ever used more then 20X for my +1000 yard shots on game/varmints so my comparison of the two are at 20x magnification or less. </p><p>Overall, depending on one's particular requirements, I think either scope is an excellent value for the dollars spent, and will deliver the goods, and I expect to see continued heavy use of both scopes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 2678368, member: 10291"] Very nice review! And some great shots on nice animals! I have a March 2.5x25x52 SFP/MTR-3 that has been hunted heavily, subjected to the elements and bumped around on and ATV for about 5 years. My experiences concerning reliability and performance are quite comparable to yours. I have not experienced ANY issues. IMO, the stand-out feature of my March is its “unique” ability cut through low sun glare/haze, frequently encountered with my first/last light whitetail hunting. I understand that it is a combination of the internal tube coating and lense design.coatings. I recently acquired, and put a season of hunting on a ZCO420, desiring FFP and MIL capability, as well as seeking improved glass (particularly low light clarity/resolution. A bit bulkier due to the 36mm tube, and about a half a pound heavier being the physical differences, IMO, the basic spec difference(s), and the optical quality(superb!), for my requirements did square the cost between the ZCO and the March. I would add that I have rarely, if ever used more then 20X for my +1000 yard shots on game/varmints so my comparison of the two are at 20x magnification or less. Overall, depending on one’s particular requirements, I think either scope is an excellent value for the dollars spent, and will deliver the goods, and I expect to see continued heavy use of both scopes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March FX 4.5-28X52 Review (So Far)
Top