Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mad as h*ll range finding in the snow
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 260705" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>There is no doubt I have a bad swaro now. It is getting worse and I forgot to mention that it will now toss me a bad number if I am trying to range somethig to far away. But I have used other Swaro's too.</p><p> </p><p>I don't buy the part about the old lieca and new leica being the same except for size. We all know some reps never step foot in the woods. I owned the bigger old 1200 LRF SCAN and I have used more than one of the new Leica 1200 CFR's. In the field!! Not at the counter at Cabelas. The new one is better ! I was side by side with my hunting buddy while we shot 5 antelope, this year, 300, 482, 713, 816, and 820 yards. Bright sun, the Leica was quicker every time. And get this, he is an avid long range hunter, took his Muley at 974 this year. He had a Leice CFR , sold it and bought a new Swaro,, Hated it so he sold it and bought another Leica CFR... </p><p> </p><p> I just want to test them all and see for my self on ALL HUNTING aspects. I am kinds on a mission with this. My Swaro cost me a 180" plus WT this year cuz it would not give me the same number twice. I would not take the shot and a chance on wounding that deer right before dark. Two days later I rook the doe at over 1100 yards in full value wind. Guess that one will stick in my throat for a while... Sorry for the rant, but really guys, I have not taken a side yet, but I am on a mission to prove which one I will hunt with next year. Time will tell. </p><p> </p><p>Thanks!</p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 260705, member: 7503"] There is no doubt I have a bad swaro now. It is getting worse and I forgot to mention that it will now toss me a bad number if I am trying to range somethig to far away. But I have used other Swaro's too. I don't buy the part about the old lieca and new leica being the same except for size. We all know some reps never step foot in the woods. I owned the bigger old 1200 LRF SCAN and I have used more than one of the new Leica 1200 CFR's. In the field!! Not at the counter at Cabelas. The new one is better ! I was side by side with my hunting buddy while we shot 5 antelope, this year, 300, 482, 713, 816, and 820 yards. Bright sun, the Leica was quicker every time. And get this, he is an avid long range hunter, took his Muley at 974 this year. He had a Leice CFR , sold it and bought a new Swaro,, Hated it so he sold it and bought another Leica CFR... I just want to test them all and see for my self on ALL HUNTING aspects. I am kinds on a mission with this. My Swaro cost me a 180" plus WT this year cuz it would not give me the same number twice. I would not take the shot and a chance on wounding that deer right before dark. Two days later I rook the doe at over 1100 yards in full value wind. Guess that one will stick in my throat for a while... Sorry for the rant, but really guys, I have not taken a side yet, but I am on a mission to prove which one I will hunt with next year. Time will tell. Thanks! Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mad as h*ll range finding in the snow
Top