Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Loss of Love for Leupold, New scope time.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GREATSCOTT!" data-source="post: 2091339" data-attributes="member: 112857"><p>No, wrong, two have asked; myself and the guy who got unrighteously chastized by the OP (and others for reasons I still don't understand after the way she talked to him). One person almost came close on page two, post #20, asking "If you don't mind my asking, I would be interested in knowing what failed on the VX6, or what the symptoms were?" The OP simply stated, "Failed to hold zero", and reassured us that everthing was locktited and shows a three-shots on a target, I'm assuming performed by the OP.</p><p></p><p>So no, it hasn't been asked several times, it was asked twice, and the only reason is because, rightfully so, he had finally had enough by nine pages of mindless historical scope conjecture, none of it educational, helpful or useful, and none of it by the OP herself, asked objective questions about how it actually came about that the scope was determined to be junk, gets both man-hated and man-shamed, being called an illiterate stupid, puffed-up "dude" just running his mouth, that needed to take her preferred PMS medication and chill out. The nicest word she could muster was sir, and even that was out the side of her running mouth. Her reaction and behavior to him on this thread was just lousy, far worse than his to her, and yet still didn't offer her process of verifying the scope was actually the problem, which is all he, and others actually interested in this ridiculous thread would like to learn.</p><p></p><p>Have a discussion, have an opinion, but at some point, we have to actually talk about the problem and fully understand why a "lifetime" shot opportunity was lost. At this point, all we got is poetic story of a missed shot opportunity of the mystical giant ghost elk from Eldorado, 15 pages of talk and assumptions, and a "test" that took 10 seconds to conduct by a person that can't take an objective question. But that's ok, she shot the second biggest elk to be had in the entire unit, not all was lost. So, if we're not allowed to ask questions, then what are we doing? Just offering sympathy to the OP? Perhaps she could learn something. Perhaps not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GREATSCOTT!, post: 2091339, member: 112857"] No, wrong, two have asked; myself and the guy who got unrighteously chastized by the OP (and others for reasons I still don't understand after the way she talked to him). One person almost came close on page two, post #20, asking "If you don’t mind my asking, I would be interested in knowing what failed on the VX6, or what the symptoms were?" The OP simply stated, "Failed to hold zero", and reassured us that everthing was locktited and shows a three-shots on a target, I'm assuming performed by the OP. So no, it hasn't been asked several times, it was asked twice, and the only reason is because, rightfully so, he had finally had enough by nine pages of mindless historical scope conjecture, none of it educational, helpful or useful, and none of it by the OP herself, asked objective questions about how it actually came about that the scope was determined to be junk, gets both man-hated and man-shamed, being called an illiterate stupid, puffed-up "dude" just running his mouth, that needed to take her preferred PMS medication and chill out. The nicest word she could muster was sir, and even that was out the side of her running mouth. Her reaction and behavior to him on this thread was just lousy, far worse than his to her, and yet still didn't offer her process of verifying the scope was actually the problem, which is all he, and others actually interested in this ridiculous thread would like to learn. Have a discussion, have an opinion, but at some point, we have to actually talk about the problem and fully understand why a "lifetime" shot opportunity was lost. At this point, all we got is poetic story of a missed shot opportunity of the mystical giant ghost elk from Eldorado, 15 pages of talk and assumptions, and a "test" that took 10 seconds to conduct by a person that can't take an objective question. But that's ok, she shot the second biggest elk to be had in the entire unit, not all was lost. So, if we're not allowed to ask questions, then what are we doing? Just offering sympathy to the OP? Perhaps she could learn something. Perhaps not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Loss of Love for Leupold, New scope time.
Top