Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Loadbase 3.0 and Exbal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 421212" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>Hey BnG, since this is a comparison thread. Maybe this would be a good test?? You have several sets of field data that you have proofed, so, run a trajectory validation at 800 yards on exbal to get it on with a proven dial up at this range. Then, run a series of other field conditions and distances to see how both LB and Exbal measure up to what it actually took for that shot to be on. Just do your best to estimate or round up or down with the LB prgram as it will be giving you come ups like 20.3 or 20.6 moa. and we know both Exbal and the scope are in .25 moa. Go ahead and run the coriolis and spin drift on LB. This test is mainly to compare dial ups, as many long range shooters realize the spin drift and coriolis affects on windage is almost impossible to test for positive. When you factor in the error factor of the combine package of the rifle, shooter and ammo along with the wind, many seasoned LR shooters believe it becomes irrelevant, or is smaller than the capability of the rifle, shooter and ammo.</p><p> </p><p>I have pages and pages of data, actual shots fired from 500 yards to one mile. I have already done this test but would like to see what your results are as I truely feel you remain unbiased.</p><p> </p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 421212, member: 7503"] Hey BnG, since this is a comparison thread. Maybe this would be a good test?? You have several sets of field data that you have proofed, so, run a trajectory validation at 800 yards on exbal to get it on with a proven dial up at this range. Then, run a series of other field conditions and distances to see how both LB and Exbal measure up to what it actually took for that shot to be on. Just do your best to estimate or round up or down with the LB prgram as it will be giving you come ups like 20.3 or 20.6 moa. and we know both Exbal and the scope are in .25 moa. Go ahead and run the coriolis and spin drift on LB. This test is mainly to compare dial ups, as many long range shooters realize the spin drift and coriolis affects on windage is almost impossible to test for positive. When you factor in the error factor of the combine package of the rifle, shooter and ammo along with the wind, many seasoned LR shooters believe it becomes irrelevant, or is smaller than the capability of the rifle, shooter and ammo. I have pages and pages of data, actual shots fired from 500 yards to one mile. I have already done this test but would like to see what your results are as I truely feel you remain unbiased. Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Loadbase 3.0 and Exbal
Top