Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Loadbase 3.0 and Exbal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigngreen" data-source="post: 421144" data-attributes="member: 13632"><p>I'll get it into the field soon hopefully, bow season is on so we'll see <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> So far just comparing it to trajectories that I have validated and know are good in Loadbase, using the same data Exbal has been about 3/4 MOA low. But, I've been shooting with LB so I know what it likes for accurate trajectories so I feel I just need to get some range time and shoot a few hundred rounds to get a feeling for what Exbal is looking for.</p><p></p><p>The speed at which I get a solution to me is only nice while sitting at home, in the field I don't care how fast I get the solution just as long as it is a good one. I take a lot of time when taking a LR shot, I sit and watch the game for half hour or more so more than likely if I were to need a solution so fast that it would make a difference then I won't shoot that rushed.</p><p></p><p>I didn't start this thread to pile on one program or the other more just to look at some of the differences and some weak or strong points between the two and to learn how they both work, mostly out of respect for some good shooters that I have seen and shot with.</p><p></p><p>I actually hope that I get to know both programs equally well so that I can use both, I don't mind redundancy at all as it helps catch mistakes I've made with an input. </p><p>Loadbase or Exbal or any other ballistics program is not a replacement for rounds down range but they sure can be a good tool!!!gun)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigngreen, post: 421144, member: 13632"] I'll get it into the field soon hopefully, bow season is on so we'll see :D So far just comparing it to trajectories that I have validated and know are good in Loadbase, using the same data Exbal has been about 3/4 MOA low. But, I've been shooting with LB so I know what it likes for accurate trajectories so I feel I just need to get some range time and shoot a few hundred rounds to get a feeling for what Exbal is looking for. The speed at which I get a solution to me is only nice while sitting at home, in the field I don't care how fast I get the solution just as long as it is a good one. I take a lot of time when taking a LR shot, I sit and watch the game for half hour or more so more than likely if I were to need a solution so fast that it would make a difference then I won't shoot that rushed. I didn't start this thread to pile on one program or the other more just to look at some of the differences and some weak or strong points between the two and to learn how they both work, mostly out of respect for some good shooters that I have seen and shot with. I actually hope that I get to know both programs equally well so that I can use both, I don't mind redundancy at all as it helps catch mistakes I've made with an input. Loadbase or Exbal or any other ballistics program is not a replacement for rounds down range but they sure can be a good tool!!!gun) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Loadbase 3.0 and Exbal
Top