Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Load Development Ruger Precision Rifle .243
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buckfvr" data-source="post: 1224202" data-attributes="member: 43353"><p><strong><span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]Sent: [/FONT]</span></strong><span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]Monday, August 15, 2016 6:32:30 PM[/FONT]</span><span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]</span></p><p><span style="color: black"><strong>Subject: </strong>Re: es/sdI [/FONT]</span></p><p> <span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]did a quick not really scientific test today with my .223 62 gr federal standard duty</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">I used the magnetto sporter and shot two different positions </span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">One position with the gun held at my hip and let it free recoil that produced more erratic and higher extreme spreads and velocity</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">2807</span></p><p><span style="color: black">2852</span></p><p><span style="color: black">2860 </span></p><p><span style="color: black">2894 </span></p><p><span style="color: black">Avg. 2853 fps ES 87</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">The other position was prone locked in to my shoulder with some force held to the rear </span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">2798</span></p><p><span style="color: black">2811</span></p><p><span style="color: black">2815</span></p><p><span style="color: black">2832</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">Avg. 2814 fps. ES 34</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">I would have to bet that kneeling or standing would produce different results also[/FONT]</span><span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">Sent from my iPhone[/FONT]</span></p><p> </p><p> <span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]On Aug 15, 2016, at 4:30 PM\[/FONT]</span></p><p> <span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]So I find myself wondering how es and sd data is collected by those who advertise both commercially and professionally. My guess would be some, if not most of it is collected using modified chambers that are immobile, test chamber/barrel configurations. That would explain some of the super low, seemingly impossible to obtain numbers for the consumer.[/FONT]</span><span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot] </span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">[/FONT]</span><strong><span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]Your non scientific yet real world test just proved to us that different methods of mounting a fire arm can and will vary es/sd results, and that a stationary chamber/barrel configuration would most likely produce numbers not obtainable from a person setting behind a rifle engaging in live fire.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: black"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: black">So...........I say we chase this to an end and post this up as another real world test conducted by shooters, as shooters, with out mechanical aids or other devices that would otherwise enhance numbers for commercial purposes. [/FONT]</span><span style="color: black">[FONT=&quot]</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: black"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: black">Think about it........we can bring results to others that are obtainable for them, and not just lofty numbers that cannot be obtained without high tech shooting equipment. That would include containment rests like the lead sled strap in models.......</span></strong></p><p> <strong><span style="color: black"></span></strong></p><p> <strong><span style="color: black">[/FONT]</span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buckfvr, post: 1224202, member: 43353"] [B][COLOR=black][FONT="]Sent: [/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=black][FONT="]Monday, August 15, 2016 6:32:30 PM[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT="] [B]Subject: [/B]Re: es/sdI [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT="]did a quick not really scientific test today with my .223 62 gr federal standard duty I used the magnetto sporter and shot two different positions One position with the gun held at my hip and let it free recoil that produced more erratic and higher extreme spreads and velocity 2807 2852 2860 2894 Avg. 2853 fps ES 87 The other position was prone locked in to my shoulder with some force held to the rear 2798 2811 2815 2832 Avg. 2814 fps. ES 34 I would have to bet that kneeling or standing would produce different results also[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT="] Sent from my iPhone[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT="]On Aug 15, 2016, at 4:30 PM\[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT="]So I find myself wondering how es and sd data is collected by those who advertise both commercially and professionally. My guess would be some, if not most of it is collected using modified chambers that are immobile, test chamber/barrel configurations. That would explain some of the super low, seemingly impossible to obtain numbers for the consumer.[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT="] [/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=black][FONT="]Your non scientific yet real world test just proved to us that different methods of mounting a fire arm can and will vary es/sd results, and that a stationary chamber/barrel configuration would most likely produce numbers not obtainable from a person setting behind a rifle engaging in live fire. So...........I say we chase this to an end and post this up as another real world test conducted by shooters, as shooters, with out mechanical aids or other devices that would otherwise enhance numbers for commercial purposes. [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT="] Think about it........we can bring results to others that are obtainable for them, and not just lofty numbers that cannot be obtained without high tech shooting equipment. That would include containment rests like the lead sled strap in models....... [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Load Development Ruger Precision Rifle .243
Top