Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Leupold warranty puts others to shame!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Centre Punch" data-source="post: 83853" data-attributes="member: 3048"><p>I dont need convincing that S&amp;Bs have better optics, engineering and possible build quality than Leupolds, but they just do not have the style and looks of a Leupold.</p><p></p><p>As i have mentioned in a previous thread, in my opinion the original MK4 16x is the best looking scope you can buy, but i cant afford one of them so i have an 8.5-25 LRT with M1 turrets, an corking scope, which has given me great service even after bouncing it along the kitchen floor!(boy did shout some choice words when that happened).</p><p></p><p>There are many aspects to scope ownership, the main one being exspense, i think we should all strive to buy the best scope we can afford and as long as we are confident with our choices, we have no right to slag off users of other brands, apart from Pete Lincoln, because he is always the first to stick the knife in when it comes to Leupold Scopes /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif. </p><p></p><p>As for warranty, i think that if Leupold knew how bad the official UK importer was when it comes to customer service, they would pull their dealership. If you have a problem with your leupold here in UK you are better off sending it back yourself /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif.</p><p></p><p>Ian.</p><p></p><p>"I meant to shoot the pike but the duck got in the way"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Centre Punch, post: 83853, member: 3048"] I dont need convincing that S&Bs have better optics, engineering and possible build quality than Leupolds, but they just do not have the style and looks of a Leupold. As i have mentioned in a previous thread, in my opinion the original MK4 16x is the best looking scope you can buy, but i cant afford one of them so i have an 8.5-25 LRT with M1 turrets, an corking scope, which has given me great service even after bouncing it along the kitchen floor!(boy did shout some choice words when that happened). There are many aspects to scope ownership, the main one being exspense, i think we should all strive to buy the best scope we can afford and as long as we are confident with our choices, we have no right to slag off users of other brands, apart from Pete Lincoln, because he is always the first to stick the knife in when it comes to Leupold Scopes [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]. As for warranty, i think that if Leupold knew how bad the official UK importer was when it comes to customer service, they would pull their dealership. If you have a problem with your leupold here in UK you are better off sending it back yourself [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]. Ian. "I meant to shoot the pike but the duck got in the way" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Leupold warranty puts others to shame!
Top