Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold or Sightron???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ernie" data-source="post: 267295" data-attributes="member: 13"><p>Patience my friend<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>I will say that the S-3 did well in after sunset comparisons-In fact, all that we looked at did good. All of them were more than capable at taking down big game after legal shooting time in WY in the conditions we had on Thursday.</p><p>In looking somewhat toward the sun in the late afternoon, the S-3 came in last of all that were compared. </p><p>In fact, beyond 1,000 yards even the 5-22 NXS came in behind the new VX-3 8.5-25 when dealing with a glare (all magnifications were moved to 20x since the Huskemaw optic is in the mix). Even the owner of the NF agreed. </p><p>I was surprised to say the least. Having said all of that, all of the scopes being compared are more than optically able to do LR work. There is more to a scope than what we have been talking about: repeatable clicks, holding zero, etc. In other words the full package is what we are looking for. So far I have been impressed by all the optics being considered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ernie, post: 267295, member: 13"] Patience my friend:) I will say that the S-3 did well in after sunset comparisons-In fact, all that we looked at did good. All of them were more than capable at taking down big game after legal shooting time in WY in the conditions we had on Thursday. In looking somewhat toward the sun in the late afternoon, the S-3 came in last of all that were compared. In fact, beyond 1,000 yards even the 5-22 NXS came in behind the new VX-3 8.5-25 when dealing with a glare (all magnifications were moved to 20x since the Huskemaw optic is in the mix). Even the owner of the NF agreed. I was surprised to say the least. Having said all of that, all of the scopes being compared are more than optically able to do LR work. There is more to a scope than what we have been talking about: repeatable clicks, holding zero, etc. In other words the full package is what we are looking for. So far I have been impressed by all the optics being considered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold or Sightron???
Top