Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Lest we forget, the "Short-Fat" technical idea.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 1569858" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>Also, an all time low for the US Patent office. While there was plenty of "prior art", the legal cost to contest the patents would easily exceed several years of any profit gain to the party contesting the patent. Add to that, the chances of overturning an issued patent is very low. Jury's and judges are useless with technical fights. As an aside, when first introduced, I bought a 223WSM and a 270WSM. Accuracy and ballistics were great but both barrels/throats were toasted in less then 500 rounds, and the Winchester brass was garbage after 3-4 reloads. I like, and agree with the attributes of the short/fat cartridge design, but IMO, they perform best when the load is well balanced, and pressures kept in check.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 1569858, member: 10291"] Also, an all time low for the US Patent office. While there was plenty of “prior art”, the legal cost to contest the patents would easily exceed several years of any profit gain to the party contesting the patent. Add to that, the chances of overturning an issued patent is very low. Jury’s and judges are useless with technical fights. As an aside, when first introduced, I bought a 223WSM and a 270WSM. Accuracy and ballistics were great but both barrels/throats were toasted in less then 500 rounds, and the Winchester brass was garbage after 3-4 reloads. I like, and agree with the attributes of the short/fat cartridge design, but IMO, they perform best when the load is well balanced, and pressures kept in check. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Lest we forget, the "Short-Fat" technical idea.
Top