Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Ladder testing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jebel" data-source="post: 1563917" data-attributes="member: 106189"><p>It's interesting to me regarding ladder testing that Realtalk seems to focus on consistency in velocity, Highdesertmike seems to focus on consistency in point-of-impact on the target, and Alex Wheeler (pointed to by odoylerules) insists that you must focus on the confluence of both consistency in velocity and point-of-impact (because sometimes they won't coincide).</p><p></p><p>I can understand how consistency in velocity and point-of-impact would coincide. They seem like two sides of the same coin. I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around why they would not coincide. If I witnessed a flattening of velocity without a corresponding flattening of point-of-impact, I'd probably figure that I'd messed up the shot and the chronograph is correct (or more likely, I'd blame it on the wind).</p><p></p><p>Can someone help me understand why these two effects aren't the same thing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jebel, post: 1563917, member: 106189"] It's interesting to me regarding ladder testing that Realtalk seems to focus on consistency in velocity, Highdesertmike seems to focus on consistency in point-of-impact on the target, and Alex Wheeler (pointed to by odoylerules) insists that you must focus on the confluence of both consistency in velocity and point-of-impact (because sometimes they won't coincide). I can understand how consistency in velocity and point-of-impact would coincide. They seem like two sides of the same coin. I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around why they would not coincide. If I witnessed a flattening of velocity without a corresponding flattening of point-of-impact, I'd probably figure that I'd messed up the shot and the chronograph is correct (or more likely, I'd blame it on the wind). Can someone help me understand why these two effects aren't the same thing? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Ladder testing
Top