Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Knockdown power myths
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brant89" data-source="post: 1306017" data-attributes="member: 49553"><p>I wouldn't argue that the big bore may be getting the job done more efficiently, but physics never lies, regardless of how something may "seem". If the animal is getting "knocked back" it is a result of the animals skeletal muscular or nervous system response to the impact, not from the momentum of the bullet. "Physics is wrong" is the typical response I get from people after I prove on paper with actual numbers that knockdown power doesn't exist. If bullets could knock an animal down you would be in pretty bad shape after squeezing the trigger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brant89, post: 1306017, member: 49553"] I wouldn't argue that the big bore may be getting the job done more efficiently, but physics never lies, regardless of how something may "seem". If the animal is getting "knocked back" it is a result of the animals skeletal muscular or nervous system response to the impact, not from the momentum of the bullet. "Physics is wrong" is the typical response I get from people after I prove on paper with actual numbers that knockdown power doesn't exist. If bullets could knock an animal down you would be in pretty bad shape after squeezing the trigger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Knockdown power myths
Top