Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
JLKs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Heeg osoh" data-source="post: 1994652" data-attributes="member: 111250"><p>Just a little update for being a huge long time fan of the 139 grain Scenars I can say that the 135 grain JLK was a eye opener. As expected my speed increased but with that I am shooting faster and with a bullet that carries a much higher BC.</p><p></p><p>They really seriously preformed well out of he 260 and it was a great move from what the down range accuracy shows. We were able to get them out to 1811 yards in August testing accuracy and the BC, my BC is at 609 G1 in the Bartlein barrel with the 135s with a 1st and 2nd round impact on the 36"steel. We crossed referenced the elevation and wind corrections between the two in my Ballistics program using Cold Bore from Patagonia and the difference was a game changer.</p><p></p><p>For those that measure and or weigh their bullets the tolerances are extremely tight to nothing, I've never seen this tight of a variation other then some solids I use in the ELR rifle.</p><p></p><p>So yes I am very happy with the change.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Iamosoh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeff Heeg osoh, post: 1994652, member: 111250"] Just a little update for being a huge long time fan of the 139 grain Scenars I can say that the 135 grain JLK was a eye opener. As expected my speed increased but with that I am shooting faster and with a bullet that carries a much higher BC. They really seriously preformed well out of he 260 and it was a great move from what the down range accuracy shows. We were able to get them out to 1811 yards in August testing accuracy and the BC, my BC is at 609 G1 in the Bartlein barrel with the 135s with a 1st and 2nd round impact on the 36”steel. We crossed referenced the elevation and wind corrections between the two in my Ballistics program using Cold Bore from Patagonia and the difference was a game changer. For those that measure and or weigh their bullets the tolerances are extremely tight to nothing, I’ve never seen this tight of a variation other then some solids I use in the ELR rifle. So yes I am very happy with the change. Iamosoh [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
JLKs
Top