Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Is the 7x61 Super Brass too thin for Improvement? Maybe the 6.5mm?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wild Monkey" data-source="post: 2838844" data-attributes="member: 103097"><p><strong>[USER=27307]sable tireur[/USER] </strong> "improving' is not restricted to shoulder angle. My design incorporates a wider "improved" shoulder width out to half an inch. The wider shoulder is an effort to improve the efficiency of the powder burn. (yes it's a Wildcat design, it's what I do). Thanks for posting the info as it gives those unaware of this excellent cartridge a great introduction. Necking this original case design down has proven to be an excellent concept, but that's not really what I consider a genuine Wildcat. I've never been one to just copy other peoples designs when it comes to Wildcats anyway = boring. You've got admit the<strong> 7 - SUPER</strong> illustration shows one dandy looking Cartridge design. </p><p></p><p><u>Mikecr</u></p><p>When Norma came out with the Super brass they made the case less thick so it would hold more powder to compete with the RM.<strong> </strong>That's where the name "Super" originally comes from.</p><p></p><p>Has anyone ever read of an improved 7x61 S&H using Norma Super brass have case ruptures?</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the reply's!! Keep them coming.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wild Monkey, post: 2838844, member: 103097"] [B][USER=27307]sable tireur[/USER] [/B] "improving' is not restricted to shoulder angle. My design incorporates a wider "improved" shoulder width out to half an inch. The wider shoulder is an effort to improve the efficiency of the powder burn. (yes it's a Wildcat design, it's what I do). Thanks for posting the info as it gives those unaware of this excellent cartridge a great introduction. Necking this original case design down has proven to be an excellent concept, but that's not really what I consider a genuine Wildcat. I've never been one to just copy other peoples designs when it comes to Wildcats anyway = boring. You've got admit the[B] 7 - SUPER[/B] illustration shows one dandy looking Cartridge design. [U]Mikecr[/U] When Norma came out with the Super brass they made the case less thick so it would hold more powder to compete with the RM.[B] [/B]That's where the name "Super" originally comes from. Has anyone ever read of an improved 7x61 S&H using Norma Super brass have case ruptures? Thanks for the reply's!! Keep them coming. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Is the 7x61 Super Brass too thin for Improvement? Maybe the 6.5mm?
Top