Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Is Tangent Theta worth the $ over NF?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chase723" data-source="post: 1937209" data-attributes="member: 21524"><p>[USER=108082]@KY_Windage[/USER] the issue is pretty apparent that you have difficulty interpreting what's written in text within the context that it's written, and your perspective is pretty myopic. I liked the post because it was hilarious. It was a reduction to the absurd...which clearly this has become. You've done nothing but get defensive, go on tirades, and try to pick/win a fight over the internet.</p><p></p><p>Plenty of people like SFP optics. They have a role, especially for ELR/Benchrest, and in LPVOs for engagements within the MPBR of a cartridge (can be pushed further if you understand the reticle and it's subtensions). FFP optics also have a role. If you're going to use a scope as an efficient tool then IMO, FFP is wayyyyyyy better. You're entitled to your opinion and preferences, but they are just that. You're opinions and preferences.</p><p></p><p>[USER=25377]@orkan[/USER] is a good guy. Anybody who has ever actually talked to him would know that. Yes, he makes a living selling alpha grade equipment and instructing training classes. So what? What's the problem with that? Frankly, it's an envious livelihood. Yes, he has his opinions but clearly we all do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chase723, post: 1937209, member: 21524"] [USER=108082]@KY_Windage[/USER] the issue is pretty apparent that you have difficulty interpreting what’s written in text within the context that it’s written, and your perspective is pretty myopic. I liked the post because it was hilarious. It was a reduction to the absurd...which clearly this has become. You’ve done nothing but get defensive, go on tirades, and try to pick/win a fight over the internet. Plenty of people like SFP optics. They have a role, especially for ELR/Benchrest, and in LPVOs for engagements within the MPBR of a cartridge (can be pushed further if you understand the reticle and it’s subtensions). FFP optics also have a role. If you’re going to use a scope as an efficient tool then IMO, FFP is wayyyyyyy better. You’re entitled to your opinion and preferences, but they are just that. You’re opinions and preferences. [USER=25377]@orkan[/USER] is a good guy. Anybody who has ever actually talked to him would know that. Yes, he makes a living selling alpha grade equipment and instructing training classes. So what? What’s the problem with that? Frankly, it’s an envious livelihood. Yes, he has his opinions but clearly we all do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Is Tangent Theta worth the $ over NF?
Top