Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Introducing the Absolute Hammer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jeremy.b" data-source="post: 1987877" data-attributes="member: 108117"><p>I ran Steve's 30-06 numbers with a close approximation of the 178 AH + h100v and QL would indeed show pretty representative velocities (using a normal starting pressure) but obviously very high pressures. So armed with that (and I've suspected this for a while) we MIGHT be able to increase the pressure threshold in QL to 75k or so with normal fill %'s and it might give us a set of powders to consider. I do doubt we can get much closer than that though with how QL is simulating everything else.</p><p></p><p>[USER=7999]@RockyMtnMT[/USER] do you have any plans to design lighter weight (say 220-230gr) 338 AH's in the near future? I'm not sure I'll have enough powder capacity in my M70 338-06 to get very far with a 260 AH (but I can try!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jeremy.b, post: 1987877, member: 108117"] I ran Steve's 30-06 numbers with a close approximation of the 178 AH + h100v and QL would indeed show pretty representative velocities (using a normal starting pressure) but obviously very high pressures. So armed with that (and I've suspected this for a while) we MIGHT be able to increase the pressure threshold in QL to 75k or so with normal fill %'s and it might give us a set of powders to consider. I do doubt we can get much closer than that though with how QL is simulating everything else. [USER=7999]@RockyMtnMT[/USER] do you have any plans to design lighter weight (say 220-230gr) 338 AH's in the near future? I'm not sure I'll have enough powder capacity in my M70 338-06 to get very far with a 260 AH (but I can try!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Introducing the Absolute Hammer
Top