Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Interesting Load Development Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jud96" data-source="post: 2008404" data-attributes="member: 69478"><p>Speaking of cold bore. Here's the second target I shot for the OCW. See the "Fouler" target, that's two shots from a cold bore from my original load. I think the cold bore on this rifle is good<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />. If you want to make your own thread describing your better methods, then by all means do so. I'm not new to load development or precision hunting rifles. I made this thread to share my interesting results and to show how two separate methods gave the same conclusion. As far as seating depth, I seated these 215s .010 off and they shot 1/8-1/4 MOA groups. I don't think you can improve that lol. I suggest doing seating depth before doing OCW, velocity testing, ladder test, etc. This wasn't a complete load development thread. Again, this was just showing my results from two separate tests and methods.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]221728[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jud96, post: 2008404, member: 69478"] Speaking of cold bore. Here’s the second target I shot for the OCW. See the “Fouler” target, that’s two shots from a cold bore from my original load. I think the cold bore on this rifle is good;). If you want to make your own thread describing your better methods, then by all means do so. I’m not new to load development or precision hunting rifles. I made this thread to share my interesting results and to show how two separate methods gave the same conclusion. As far as seating depth, I seated these 215s .010 off and they shot 1/8-1/4 MOA groups. I don’t think you can improve that lol. I suggest doing seating depth before doing OCW, velocity testing, ladder test, etc. This wasn’t a complete load development thread. Again, this was just showing my results from two separate tests and methods. [ATTACH type="full"]221728[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Interesting Load Development Results
Top