Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Interesting Load Development Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jud96" data-source="post: 2007800" data-attributes="member: 69478"><p>Exactly what you described is what lined up with my velocity testing and my OCW testing. Again, I ran both forms of load development months apart. The OCW method showed 70.7 and 70.8 shooting very good groups and hitting very close to the same point of impact. My velocity testing also showed 70.7 and 70.8 being a flat spot or node in the velocity. I think it is very conclusive that using multiple methods can lead you in the right direction if done correctly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jud96, post: 2007800, member: 69478"] Exactly what you described is what lined up with my velocity testing and my OCW testing. Again, I ran both forms of load development months apart. The OCW method showed 70.7 and 70.8 shooting very good groups and hitting very close to the same point of impact. My velocity testing also showed 70.7 and 70.8 being a flat spot or node in the velocity. I think it is very conclusive that using multiple methods can lead you in the right direction if done correctly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Interesting Load Development Results
Top