Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Interesting Load Development Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="25WSM" data-source="post: 2007788" data-attributes="member: 38048"><p>Jud your test show exactly what I teach my customers to do as far as velocity testing. Just looking at the first sheet I concluded that 70.7 would be the load I start with. Then after doing seating depth I would do 70.6 70.7 and 70.8 and see what it liked best. I always take the node and cut the bottom half off and then use the middle of what's left.</p><p>70.2</p><p>70.4</p><p>70.6</p><p>70.8</p><p>Cut in half leaves the 70.6 and 70.8 and right in the middle of that is the 70.7 I would have started at. This method seems to work almost 100% of the time.</p><p>Shep</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="25WSM, post: 2007788, member: 38048"] Jud your test show exactly what I teach my customers to do as far as velocity testing. Just looking at the first sheet I concluded that 70.7 would be the load I start with. Then after doing seating depth I would do 70.6 70.7 and 70.8 and see what it liked best. I always take the node and cut the bottom half off and then use the middle of what's left. 70.2 70.4 70.6 70.8 Cut in half leaves the 70.6 and 70.8 and right in the middle of that is the 70.7 I would have started at. This method seems to work almost 100% of the time. Shep [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Interesting Load Development Results
Top