Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
"Inherent accuracy"...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MachV" data-source="post: 32732" data-attributes="member: 93"><p><strong>proper amount of input</strong></p><p> Great statement and might just be the bottom line to the question.</p><p> Lets beat STL with his example for a minute(or two <img src="http://images/icons/tongue.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> .He suggests that the 50bmg is a walk in the park to get good groups out of.He however didnt go into this quite as haphasard as he would have a rookie believe.First off he is a diciplined shooter properly trained in good form and the Wolf has conditioned him a little for the recoil.He chose a good gun with a great brake,then put good rings on it with a great scope!He then reloaded 750Amaxes(measured for length to the millionth <img src="http://images/icons/grin.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> and H50BMG(again proven performers).I doubt too that he gives his walking encyclopedia and calculator of a spotter enough credit <img src="http://images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />.I wonder too if his results would have ben the same 5 years ago?</p><p> Inherently accurate or inaccurate?Yes its a factor but definatly not the biggest factor as there is no substitute for proper settup,trigger time and correct translation of the results.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MachV, post: 32732, member: 93"] [B]proper amount of input[/B] Great statement and might just be the bottom line to the question. Lets beat STL with his example for a minute(or two [img]images/icons/tongue.gif[/img] .He suggests that the 50bmg is a walk in the park to get good groups out of.He however didnt go into this quite as haphasard as he would have a rookie believe.First off he is a diciplined shooter properly trained in good form and the Wolf has conditioned him a little for the recoil.He chose a good gun with a great brake,then put good rings on it with a great scope!He then reloaded 750Amaxes(measured for length to the millionth [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] and H50BMG(again proven performers).I doubt too that he gives his walking encyclopedia and calculator of a spotter enough credit [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img].I wonder too if his results would have ben the same 5 years ago? Inherently accurate or inaccurate?Yes its a factor but definatly not the biggest factor as there is no substitute for proper settup,trigger time and correct translation of the results. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
"Inherent accuracy"...
Top