Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
ICAO or Army BCs data ??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 74714" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>There isn't alot of difference between the SL standards. But I believe the idea expressed with the pistol bullet related to those bullet makers who imply BC without regard to appples/apples conditions. </p><p>For example, there is nothing preventing Berger from reporting local BC obtained at 5000' and Mach3(without mention of that). We would buy their bullets assuming initially that BC was obtained under std SL conditions, and seeing what appears as an advantage. Afterall, Berger does not provide any basis that I'm aware of for their numbers. Not even mach#.</p><p>There are alot of bullets to choose from, and BC is very important at long range. Unfortunately, there isn't an independant body to report BC based on a single standard. Except that published from the gov't(.308s).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 74714, member: 1521"] There isn't alot of difference between the SL standards. But I believe the idea expressed with the pistol bullet related to those bullet makers who imply BC without regard to appples/apples conditions. For example, there is nothing preventing Berger from reporting local BC obtained at 5000' and Mach3(without mention of that). We would buy their bullets assuming initially that BC was obtained under std SL conditions, and seeing what appears as an advantage. Afterall, Berger does not provide any basis that I'm aware of for their numbers. Not even mach#. There are alot of bullets to choose from, and BC is very important at long range. Unfortunately, there isn't an independant body to report BC based on a single standard. Except that published from the gov't(.308s). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
ICAO or Army BCs data ??
Top