Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
I Hate Hammer Bullets!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bob Wright" data-source="post: 2405691" data-attributes="member: 104363"><p>I think every bullet construction falls into brackets of performance at distance/speed. Then the big variable of the "nut behind the trigger".</p><p>There is no magic bullet. Everyone has an opinion. Not every opinion has test data to back it up. Every animal dies on its own terms if some little thing goes wrong from the above ^^^</p><p>I started with corelock's years before "longrange" was a word.</p><p>There is a dizzying amount of component choices. Tons of bias to go with it, maybe based on one hunt.</p><p>You're not going to win the "info war" based on bias.</p><p>Steve, you should bracket performance on proof that you currently have and supplied by photos, data and challenging counter arguments by other social media.</p><p>I haven't been able to take an animal due to limited opportunities. I have Hammers to test other than paper.</p><p>I guess you're going to have to earn more respect. Somehow, some way.</p><p>Berger didn't start with hunting ammo, right? Win on Sunday, sell on Monday is the theme.</p><p>Show your success from hunts or wins.</p><p>I'm going to make them the solid of choice at this point. I'll try others as well. It's what we do, but at the cost, it's a critical decision going forward. I have to prove it to myself, but I have the info I need to push forward with Hammer, quietly, and real world experience. Empirical data for myself. Whether anyone believes me or others is all you have at this point. How does Hammer compile convincing empirical data and challenge the naysayers?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bob Wright, post: 2405691, member: 104363"] I think every bullet construction falls into brackets of performance at distance/speed. Then the big variable of the "nut behind the trigger". There is no magic bullet. Everyone has an opinion. Not every opinion has test data to back it up. Every animal dies on its own terms if some little thing goes wrong from the above ^^^ I started with corelock's years before "longrange" was a word. There is a dizzying amount of component choices. Tons of bias to go with it, maybe based on one hunt. You're not going to win the "info war" based on bias. Steve, you should bracket performance on proof that you currently have and supplied by photos, data and challenging counter arguments by other social media. I haven't been able to take an animal due to limited opportunities. I have Hammers to test other than paper. I guess you're going to have to earn more respect. Somehow, some way. Berger didn't start with hunting ammo, right? Win on Sunday, sell on Monday is the theme. Show your success from hunts or wins. I'm going to make them the solid of choice at this point. I'll try others as well. It's what we do, but at the cost, it's a critical decision going forward. I have to prove it to myself, but I have the info I need to push forward with Hammer, quietly, and real world experience. Empirical data for myself. Whether anyone believes me or others is all you have at this point. How does Hammer compile convincing empirical data and challenge the naysayers? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
I Hate Hammer Bullets!
Top