Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
I am very dissapointed with Berger bullets regarding the 338 hybrid bullet.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 402435" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>You've created a different scenario with dramatically differing case volumes, than the one I'm discussing. I agree with your opinion with respect to the example/illustration you have created/provided. But I don't agree that your example sheds any light on the scenario being discussed.</p><p></p><p>Here's the scenario I'm discussing: Take the reduced powder load from the 45-70 load and use it in the 458 Lott case. Now with that 45-70 powder charge held constant, vary the seating depth from having the bullet jammed into the lands (maximizing interior case volume) to the bullet seated deeper into the case (decreasing interior case volume). Then run these .458 Lott loads with every aspect of the load remaining constant other than the seating depths, over the chronograph. Record the MVs. MV will be highest with the bullet jammed into the lands, and MV will decrease as the interior casing volume is decreased by progressively seating the bullet further into the casing. </p><p></p><p>This is the scenario my comments and discussion apply to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 402435, member: 4191"] You've created a different scenario with dramatically differing case volumes, than the one I'm discussing. I agree with your opinion with respect to the example/illustration you have created/provided. But I don't agree that your example sheds any light on the scenario being discussed. Here's the scenario I'm discussing: Take the reduced powder load from the 45-70 load and use it in the 458 Lott case. Now with that 45-70 powder charge held constant, vary the seating depth from having the bullet jammed into the lands (maximizing interior case volume) to the bullet seated deeper into the case (decreasing interior case volume). Then run these .458 Lott loads with every aspect of the load remaining constant other than the seating depths, over the chronograph. Record the MVs. MV will be highest with the bullet jammed into the lands, and MV will decrease as the interior casing volume is decreased by progressively seating the bullet further into the casing. This is the scenario my comments and discussion apply to. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
I am very dissapointed with Berger bullets regarding the 338 hybrid bullet.
Top