Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Hydrostatic shock, what's your opinion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Code4" data-source="post: 1705357" data-attributes="member: 26988"><p>Many years ago I shot a blue wiledeast front on with a bonded 165 grain .308w projectile at less than 100 metres. We found it stone dead 200 metres away almost immediately. The round had not penetrated the sternum (which is like the prow of the Titanic) but had tram lined around the ribs and come to rest under the front right scapula. No blood was lost. We assumed the impact had stopped the heart. Not hydraulic shock but somekind of shock.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Code4, post: 1705357, member: 26988"] Many years ago I shot a blue wiledeast front on with a bonded 165 grain .308w projectile at less than 100 metres. We found it stone dead 200 metres away almost immediately. The round had not penetrated the sternum (which is like the prow of the Titanic) but had tram lined around the ribs and come to rest under the front right scapula. No blood was lost. We assumed the impact had stopped the heart. Not hydraulic shock but somekind of shock. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Hydrostatic shock, what's your opinion?
Top