Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Huskemaw Good or Bad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SBruce" data-source="post: 709041" data-attributes="member: 21068"><p>That reminds me, which I forgot to mention above......I wish the reticle had 2 or 3 dashes below the center intersection, spaced in some sort of MOA configuration, possibly 2 MOA spacing X 3 dashes.? </p><p> </p><p>Possible downside to the scope is that there is currently no "holdover" dashes, dots, ticks or otherwise for quick shots at the 350 to 500 yd range, scope pretty much has to be dialed for anything further than 1 MOA drop beyond the zero distance. Not very quick if the dust cover is screwed on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SBruce, post: 709041, member: 21068"] That reminds me, which I forgot to mention above......I wish the reticle had 2 or 3 dashes below the center intersection, spaced in some sort of MOA configuration, possibly 2 MOA spacing X 3 dashes.? Possible downside to the scope is that there is currently no "holdover" dashes, dots, ticks or otherwise for quick shots at the 350 to 500 yd range, scope pretty much has to be dialed for anything further than 1 MOA drop beyond the zero distance. Not very quick if the dust cover is screwed on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Huskemaw Good or Bad
Top