Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How many of you went back (scales)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="varmintH8R" data-source="post: 952220" data-attributes="member: 39801"><p>Your question got me thinking. I would have to say it is probably inconsequential. Here is my rationale:</p><p></p><p>Assuming a 40 gr charge, his one cut kernel to get .02 gr is approximately .05% of the total. </p><p></p><p>If measuring to 0.02grains is splitting hairs, the burn rate change for that one-third of a kernel, 0.05% of total, is splitting the hair growing on the hair.</p><p></p><p>I love the concept and attention to detail though! These threads make me feel like the most imprecise hack loader ever!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="varmintH8R, post: 952220, member: 39801"] Your question got me thinking. I would have to say it is probably inconsequential. Here is my rationale: Assuming a 40 gr charge, his one cut kernel to get .02 gr is approximately .05% of the total. If measuring to 0.02grains is splitting hairs, the burn rate change for that one-third of a kernel, 0.05% of total, is splitting the hair growing on the hair. I love the concept and attention to detail though! These threads make me feel like the most imprecise hack loader ever! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How many of you went back (scales)
Top