Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How many of you went back (scales)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="varmintH8R" data-source="post: 946844" data-attributes="member: 39801"><p>I love when these topics become border disputes. At the risk of being controversial, I'd have to say it is a matter of preference and nothing more. When all is said and done it is the same powder, with relative variance that is insignificant to the end result. </p><p></p><p>E scales are probably faster - the 8 minutes I save has no value to me. I enjoy the process, I'm not a factory. I can just TiVo the "Real Houswives" and skip the commercials. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> Model T vs New Corvette analogy - maybe a little bit of an overstatement - only true if you are using either to puts to the end of the driveway to get your mail. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now I often agree with Gary, but I struggle with this argument mightily. If PW or RR are using the same level of technology as is used in your Chargemaster, I would be pretty surprised. Not at all saying the Chargemaster isn't perfectly effective for reloading, I just don't see the parallel. </p><p></p><p>The argument is drinking a Coke through a straw vs drinking it from the can. History tells us you will get that refreshing Coke down either way. To each his own. </p><p></p><p>Brandon</p><p></p><p>PS corncob tumbling is only for jerks and morons. If you are still doing it you are lucky you haven't blown off your face.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="varmintH8R, post: 946844, member: 39801"] I love when these topics become border disputes. At the risk of being controversial, I'd have to say it is a matter of preference and nothing more. When all is said and done it is the same powder, with relative variance that is insignificant to the end result. E scales are probably faster - the 8 minutes I save has no value to me. I enjoy the process, I'm not a factory. I can just TiVo the "Real Houswives" and skip the commercials. :rolleyes: Model T vs New Corvette analogy - maybe a little bit of an overstatement - only true if you are using either to puts to the end of the driveway to get your mail. Now I often agree with Gary, but I struggle with this argument mightily. If PW or RR are using the same level of technology as is used in your Chargemaster, I would be pretty surprised. Not at all saying the Chargemaster isn't perfectly effective for reloading, I just don't see the parallel. The argument is drinking a Coke through a straw vs drinking it from the can. History tells us you will get that refreshing Coke down either way. To each his own. Brandon PS corncob tumbling is only for jerks and morons. If you are still doing it you are lucky you haven't blown off your face. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How many of you went back (scales)
Top