Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How dishonest is published data!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2784368" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>Not at all claiming there isn't dishonest or deliberately biased "data" - just that this particular case doesn't even seem misleading so much as completely wrong, out to lunch to</p><p>Use my term from before.</p><p></p><p>I'll straight up call Nosler out for making all weatherby cartridges look weaker than they are in their data, no doubt to make their newer Nosler cartridges look better when for the most part they don't do a thing the old wby rounds can't do except ditch the belt. </p><p></p><p>And it's more conspicuous that their mainstream cartridge data is honest and full power compared to many sources. Their .270 and .300 win mag date matches my own experiences, showing the true potential of these rounds compared to factory ammo. Neither of those are competing with the 27 or 30 Nosler the way the 270 wby and 300 wby and .30-378 are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2784368, member: 109862"] Not at all claiming there isn’t dishonest or deliberately biased “data” - just that this particular case doesn’t even seem misleading so much as completely wrong, out to lunch to Use my term from before. I’ll straight up call Nosler out for making all weatherby cartridges look weaker than they are in their data, no doubt to make their newer Nosler cartridges look better when for the most part they don’t do a thing the old wby rounds can’t do except ditch the belt. And it’s more conspicuous that their mainstream cartridge data is honest and full power compared to many sources. Their .270 and .300 win mag date matches my own experiences, showing the true potential of these rounds compared to factory ammo. Neither of those are competing with the 27 or 30 Nosler the way the 270 wby and 300 wby and .30-378 are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How dishonest is published data!
Top