Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How dishonest is published data!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ARlife4me" data-source="post: 2783570" data-attributes="member: 105694"><p>Sierra is the only published data that I know of that gives different bc's at various velocities. Again, I know it changes depending on lots of variables. Still the 107mk info along with other published data is way out of whack. When you get to the 130 and up class it's closer to published. Even though this cartridge is built for heavier bullets that are longer and makes it closer to 2.955". Maybe I'll call Sierra and talk about their 6.5prc data. I'll post their reply on Monday if I'm able too talk with them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ARlife4me, post: 2783570, member: 105694"] Sierra is the only published data that I know of that gives different bc's at various velocities. Again, I know it changes depending on lots of variables. Still the 107mk info along with other published data is way out of whack. When you get to the 130 and up class it's closer to published. Even though this cartridge is built for heavier bullets that are longer and makes it closer to 2.955". Maybe I'll call Sierra and talk about their 6.5prc data. I'll post their reply on Monday if I'm able too talk with them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
How dishonest is published data!
Top